Economic Blackout Day: Consumers Plan February 28 Boycott of Amazon, Walmart & Target to Protest Corporate Greed.
Fueled by rising prices and economic inequality, the People’s Union USA is organizing an “Economic Blackout Day” on February 28, urging consumers to boycott major corporations like Amazon, Walmart, and Target. Founder John Schwarz aims to raise awareness about corporate greed, sparking a social media movement supported by influencers and driven by growing public frustration. Will this one-day boycott impact these retail giants or simply highlight the power of collective action against perceived economic exploitation?
The People’s Union USA, a grassroots organization, is spearheading a movement known as “Economic Blackout Day” set for February 28. This initiative calls on consumers to refrain from spending money at major corporations, including Amazon, Walmart, and Target, for a full 24 hours. The goal, according to the group’s founder John Schwarz, is to raise awareness about the increasing prices and corporate greed that many Americans feel are detrimental to their economic well-being.
The Genesis of Economic Blackout Day ###
John Schwarz, a Chicago-area meditation and mindfulness educator, initiated the Economic Blackout Day campaign roughly a month before its scheduled date. His aim was to organize a nonpartisan protest against what he perceives as economic exploitation by large corporations. Schwarz’s message has resonated with thousands of people across social media platforms, with many sharing infographics and encouraging others to join the protest. Google’s search data reflects a surge in interest, indicating the campaign’s growing momentum.
Schwarz has also created a website for the People’s Union USA, which serves as a hub for the protest effort. The organization’s goal is to “unionize working-class people across the country” and fight for economic justice and systemic change. Schwarz emphasizes that the campaign transcends political labels, focusing instead on the broader issues of corporate greed and economic inequality.
The Mechanics of the Boycott ###
The Economic Blackout Day is designed to be a comprehensive boycott, targeting not just retail giants like Amazon, Walmart, and Target, but also fast food chains and gas stations. Schwarz’s directive is clear: “No Amazon, no Walmart, no fast food, no gas, not a single unnecessary dollar spent.” The campaign encourages participants to spend money only on essentials and to support small, local businesses if they must purchase anything.
In addition to the one-day blackout, the People’s Union USA has planned further actions, including weeklong boycotts of specific companies throughout the year. These include boycotts of Amazon from March 7-14, Nestlé from March 21-28, Walmart from April 7-14, and another general 24-hour economic blackout on April 18. This strategy aims to keep the pressure on corporations and maintain public awareness of the movement’s goals.
Corporate Greed and Public Sentiment ###
The driving force behind the Economic Blackout Day is the widespread frustration with corporate greed and the rising cost of living. Schwarz articulates this sentiment in a video, stating, “For our entire lives, they have told us we have no choice… that this is just how things are, we have to accept these insane prices, the corporate greed, the billionaire tax breaks, all while we struggle just to get by.” This resonates with many Americans who are facing increasing grocery bills, a frozen housing market, and record-high credit card debt.
A recent consumer confidence report showed the sharpest decline since August 2021, reflecting the growing economic anxiety among the public. Schwarz’s campaign taps into this discontent, framing the blackout as a “warning shot” to corporations that have been treating the American people as an “endless source of profit.” The movement aims to highlight how corporations raise prices, pay workers the bare minimum, and lobby politicians to maintain a system that benefits them at the expense of ordinary citizens.
The Role of Social Media and Influencers ###
Social media has been instrumental in spreading the message of the Economic Blackout Day. Influential figures such as author Stephen King and actors John Leguizamo and Bette Midler have used their platforms to support the boycott. King, for instance, posted on Bluesky, urging people not to buy anything on February 28 unless absolutely necessary, tying the boycott to broader political frustrations. Midler echoed this sentiment, encouraging followers to freeze their spending and support local businesses if they must purchase anything.
The campaign’s reach has been amplified by social media analytics, with Schwarz gaining hundreds of thousands of new followers across TikTok and Instagram since promoting the idea. This online traction has been crucial in mobilizing support for the boycott, as people share infographics and encourage others to participate in the protest. The power of social media in driving collective action cannot be underestimated, as it allows for rapid dissemination of information and the organization of large-scale movements.
Potential Impact and Unintended Consequences ###
While the Economic Blackout Day aims to send a strong message to corporations, experts have mixed views on its potential impact. Retail expert Beth Romer warns that boycotts can have unintended consequences, particularly for gig workers and smaller businesses that rely on the platforms of larger companies. She points out that independent sellers on Amazon and Instacart drivers, for example, depend on daily sales and tips, and a boycott could hurt local economies.
Romer believes that a one-day blackout is unlikely to cause lasting damage to corporations, but it could open some eyes to the issues at hand. She suggests that the only way to achieve a lasting economic impact would be through sustained boycotts. Economic analyst Mark Hamrick echoes this sentiment, noting that a more consistent and sustained movement toward buying local and supporting privately owned businesses could gain momentum. However, he acknowledges the challenge of finding enough businesses that fit this description over an extended period.
The Broader Context: DEI and Political Movements ###
The Economic Blackout Day intersects with broader political and social movements, particularly those related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Several political organizations have voiced support for the boycott, specifically citing the rollback of DEI efforts by major corporations. Companies like Walmart, Lowe’s, Ford, and Toyota have dialed back their DEI programs, prompting calls for targeted boycotts of brands that have slashed these initiatives.
The Trump administration’s recent executive orders against DEI have added fuel to the fire, with civil rights organizations challenging these directives in court. Target, for example, announced the end of its three-year DEI goals and related programs, drawing immediate calls for a boycott from shoppers who urged switching to companies like Costco, which continues to support diversity efforts. The Economic Blackout Day thus aligns with other grassroots movements, such as the “Latino Freeze,” which advocates for supporting businesses that uphold DEI and immigrant communities.
The Effectiveness of Boycotts: Historical and Economic Perspectives ###
Historically, boycotts have been most effective when their actions and demands are clearly defined and when participation is unified and sustained. Zachary Crockett, host of The Economics of Everyday Things podcast, notes that collective action can lead to change, especially when it targets key points in a corporation’s supply chain or sales channels. However, he cautions that a 24-hour protest may not be enough to make a significant difference, as boycotts become less effective as wealth becomes more concentrated.
Crockett points out that boycotts come at a cost to participants, and consumers generally have less financial “runway” than corporations do when making sustained economic sacrifices. He also notes that not shopping for a day could hurt the protesters more than the corporations, as many people rely on these companies for their daily purchases. The challenge, therefore, is to maintain the momentum of the boycott beyond a single day and to strategically target corporations in ways that maximize impact.
Implications and Conclusion ###
The Economic Blackout Day represents a significant effort to challenge corporate greed and raise awareness of economic inequality. While the immediate impact of a one-day boycott may be limited, the campaign’s broader message and sustained actions could lead to more significant changes. The involvement of social media influencers and the alignment with other political and social movements, such as those related to DEI, amplify the campaign’s reach and potential impact.
As consumers grapple with rising prices and economic challenges, movements like the Economic Blackout Day serve as a reminder of the power of collective action. Whether or not the boycott achieves its immediate goals, it highlights the growing public frustration with corporate practices and the need for systemic change. The success of such efforts will depend on the ability to maintain momentum, strategically target corporations, and engage a broad coalition of supporters in the fight for economic justice.
Leave a Reply